Swampy’s Weblog Real life is just another window

4Oct/093

Michael Moore, Healthcare and Captialism


Last February I wrote a post titled Capitalisms Death. Looking back and rereading it now nothing has really changed. In fact, things have gotten more extreme and more obvious as the presidency of Barack Obama unfolds. In some ways it seems like he is really trying to make some basic changes in the way things work, but is simply unable to overcome the Washington machine. Other times, it seems like he is just like all the other politicos and it is just going to be business as usual.

The only good thing about the way things are now is that all the cards are on the table and the masks are coming off.

Just watch the health care debate, with all its twisting and posturing on the part of the elected. Even though the majority of citizens wants universal health care with a public option it is simply never going to happen. The wheels have been greased and the guys with the oil cans are right out in the open. A million and a half bucks a day going for lobbying! That is major clout. The only surprising thing to me about this is who's kicking in the money. If the $280 million spent on lobbying is broken down by industry the actual insurers only account for 17%, rounding the millions off. Almost half is being kicked in by manufacturers of drugs and health products. Here's how it breaks down:

Who is fighting health care

Who is fighting health care

And here is an overview of how the money is being spent.

Divide the bacon

Divide the bacon

(These two illustrations scraped from CNN.)

One question that isn't being pursued is: which politicians are being paid off? As far as I know, the only media network pursuing this question is CNN. Rick Sanchez is proving to be fairly relentless in his pursuit of this question. He is also bringing light to the subject by comparing what the politicians received with their voting records. Good job Rick!

What will it take to actually change things? There's certainly no doubt that the linkage between Washington and Wall Street breeds corruption and that things with the financial sector are right out of control. Maybe part of the problem is that the snippets of damning information come out one by one, so that people just don't get a real overview.

Perhaps Michael Moore's new movie on capitalism will provide that overview. He certainly did a good job of priming the pump for the health care debate with his previous film Sicko. I'm only afraid that he's preaching to the choir. Viewers of his movies may have their mind changed about the issues, but if they don't occupy a seat in Washington it doesn't seem to make much real difference.

Incidentally, I watched Mr Moore in several TV appearances for the release of Capitalism a Love Story, and I was very impressed by his demeanor. He's very thoughtful and forceful in his assertions, but he isn't a rabble-rouser by any stretch of the imagination and he defends himself well from most attacks. Wolf Blitzer was trying to get him to admit he was a socialist, since the opposite of capitalism is socialism, and his answer was masterful: Capitalism is a sixteenth century system. Socialism is a nineteenth century system. This is the twenty-first century and we should have our own system. This really opens things up by destroying the false dichotomy between socialism and capitalism. Why not develop a new system that is neither socialist nor capitalist? DOH!

According to Matt Taibbi, who writes for Rolling Stone. the economy is only going to get worse if something radical isn't done. Capitalism is a system devised to steal wealth from everyone else and deposit it in the pockets of a few. I called this suck up economics in my previous post to contrast it with Reagan's supposed trickle-down economy. Mr Taibbi says we are having such an interesting time now because the fatties have stolen everything from us and have turned on each other. (In his movie Michael Moore states that the top 1% of society now has more wealth than the bottom 95% combined. I've seen this figure cited elsewhere as well.) He also says that Goldman Sachs has engineered every boom and bust since the great depression. They win under all circumstances regardless of who loses. He penned one of the great lines in journalistic history by saying that Goldman Sachs was a vampire squid wrapped around the head of humanity. His article in Rolling Stone can be found here. And here is a video of Matt Taibbi discussing his story.Matt Taibi explains the vampire squid.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
11Feb/096

Capitalism’s Death


Iceland is gone. Bankrupt. Kaput.

What I didn't realize, is that Iceland was an example of Captialism-on steroids. They had deregulated almost everything and created a hedge-fund haven. Citizens had been so seduced by the idea of easy, unlimited credit that the average indebtedness was 220%. The toxic asset drama in the US brought the whole thing crashing down.

For decades, we in the west have held that communism was a corrupt ideal. We were told that communism had never worked anyplace that it was tried, and that the purer the variant the more sure the failure.

What we weren't told, is that the same can be said of pure capitalism. It has never worked either. Any country that has adopted it in the pure form has crashed and burned. Iceland is the latest example. Argentina is another.
Capitalism unrestrained is like an engine controlled by positive feedback. It runs faster and faster until it flies apart. This is what we are confronting now.

Adam Smith, who is often cited as the father of Capitalism, warned of this very thing. He presumed that Christian principles and charity would act as a countervailing force and prevent the kind of runaway we are experiencing now.

It's really interesting that Bernard Madoff is the only person under investigation so far, because his shenanigans are just an example of what was going on in the realm of finance for a long, long time. The immediate cause of the present crisis is, supposedly, the bundling of worthless mortgages and then selling these bundles as if they were really worth something.

In fact, a great deal of the supposed value that has been traded in the last thirty years has been anexample of the Emperor's Clothes. I was reading books back in the 1970's that warned that the financial structure was built out of smoke and mirrors. These were not books written by conspiracy theorists either, but real economists. Had letters after their names and everything. All of them said that the system could not survive for much longer because the value of the assets supporting it were either non-existent or grossly overvalued.  At that time, as I recall, there were four main areas being misrepresented:

  1. Oil tankers that were obsolete were being carried on the books at new value.
  2. Worthless land valued as if it were prime development acreage.
  3. Loans to third world countries which would never be repaid still counting as assets.
  4. Condos which were built on spec and essentially worthless carried on the books at full value.

Somehow, the system endured until now, thanks to being propped up by a series of international bank conferences and emergency sessions of the IMF. Each time the system was propped, a newer more outrageous way of misrepresenting value was concocted until we arrived at the mortgage backed securities that seem to have finally blown a hole in the bottom of the boat. But the rot runs much deeper than houses being sold to people who couldn't afford them. The real core of things is that the wizards of finance have been spinning straw into gold for a long time.

When Capitalism runs without any check or regulation things get very weird. People act as though a healthy stock market equates to a healthy economy. Dollar value is treated as the only value. Wealth doesn't trickle down, its sucked up into fewer and fewer pockets. People are conned and controlled by the possibility of becoming one of the select and mostly ignore the day to day reality of their lives.

I don't claim to know what the answers are, but it has to be much more than simply pumping money into the system. That is probably important as well. Even if I don't know the answer, I do know that the touchstone will have to be the everyday welfare of the society as a whole. Let's put an end to this worship of wealth for its own sake and focus on quality of life instead.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
2Feb/090

Don’t Ask Don’t Tell


Karl Rove

When he was leaving office President Bush made a big noise about not having issued any pardons on his way out the door. Now it is coming to light that he gave all his buds get-out-of-jail-free cards instead. Apparently Carl Rove has one, as does Harriet Myers.

The President tried to use something he called (I think) Presidential Authority in Perpetuity to ensure that Rove could never be compelled to testify before any investigative body ever.

This is definitely a pre-emptive strike against any attempt to find out what went on in the White House during the years of the Bush presidency. The only way we will have of looking back will be when someone squawks and publishes an expose book the way Scott McClellan did.

If this blanket policy is allowed to stand it will effectively put an end to the contempt of congress action which has been underway in the house and certainly puts an end to any possibility of Bush, Cheney or Rumsfeld ever being investigated for or charged with war crimes for what has taken place in Iraq. I suppose its vaguely possible that somebody might have an attack of conscience and testify voluntarilly, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

This edict may eventually be overturned, but it will probably take years to do so and the possibility of any serious consequences be leveled against this group will be moot by then.

If anybody can unsnarl this it would be President Obama. He was a professor of constutional law, after all. The analysis I saw this morning suggested that Bush et al were banking on Obama's having a blind spot. They are betting that he just wants to move forward and fix things much more than he wants to look back, assign blame and punish.

Personally, I think that would be a huge mistake. It would leave the whole notion of the imperial presidency,  which Bush used to justify so many of his actions, totally unexamined. Unless that doctrine is openly repudiated its only a matter of time before it resurfaces. This idea is so contrary to what America should be about that it has to be staked like a vampire, once and for all.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
No more security certificates